Analytical Methods for Quantitative Estimation of Ambroxol HCl in Pharmaceutical Preparation: A Review
Veena Devi Singh1*, Sanjay J. Daharwal2
1Research Scholar, University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur CG 492010
2Assistant Professor, University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur CG 492010
*Corresponding Author E-mail: veena1806@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Context: Ambroxol Hcl is an active metabolite of bromohexine. It is an expectoration improver and a mucolytic agent used in the treatment of bronchial asthma and chronic bronchitis.The available formulation of Ambroxol was authorized first in market since 1978.
Objective:This article highlights on published analytical methods reported in the literature for the determination of Ambroxol Hcl in biological samples and pharmaceutical formulations.
Material and Methods: Various techniques like electrochemical, spectrophotometry, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), Gas chromatography, Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) were used for the qualitative and quantitative estimation of Ambroxol Hcl.
Result and Discussion: Literature reveals that most widely used diluents are methanol and distilled water in HPLC methods, which prolonged the run times with greater tailing factor. For spectrometric determination, the presence of multiple entities and excipients includes complexity with multi- component dosage forms, which could produce significant challenge to the analytical chemist during the development of assay procedure. For such instances, chemo-metric methods can be preferred to routine spectrophotometric methods.
Conclusion: Amongst various analytical techniques available for the quantification of single and multicomponent dosage form. HPLC methods are most extensively used for analysis of Ambroxol Hcl.
KEYWORDS: Ambroxol HCl, Analytical methods, biological fluid, Mucolytic agent and pharmaceutical formulation.
INTRODUCTION:
Ambroxol hydrochloride is chemically 4-{((2-amino-3,5-dibromophenyl)-methyl)-amino)}-cyclohexanol or N-{((trans-phydroxycyclohexyl),(2-amino-3,5-dibromo benzyl))}-amine,(Figure 1.) which is a semi synthetic derivative of vasicine obtained from the Indian herbal shrub “Adhatoda vasica”. Ambroxol HCl is an active metabolite of bromohexin, and it is a mucolytic agent, used as an expectoration improver as well as in the treatment of chronic bronchitis and bronchial asthma (Pai et al.; 2005). It was authorized first in market since 1978. Here, many formulations are available such as tablet, syrup, pastilles, sachet and dry powder, drops, ampoules and inhalation solution, as well as effervescent tablet in market in individual component and in combination with other drugs.
The drug is official in Indian Pharmacopoeia (Indian Pharmacopoeia 2007), British Pharmacopoeia (British Pharmacopoeia 2005), and European Pharmacopoeia (European Pharmacopoeia 2005).It is sparingly soluble in water and ethanol, soluble in dimethyl formamide (DMF), methanol and insoluble in chloroform and benzene. It is a white yellowish crystalline powder; melting point 240°C; administered orally. The dose of Ambroxol hydrochloride is 30-60 mg per day. The molecular weight of Ambroxol Hydrochloride is 414.6, and their Pharmacological properties namely surfactant stimulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant and local anesthetic effects in addition to the muco-kinetic and mucociliary effects of the parent compound. Recognition of the surfactant stimulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of the drug has led to the resurgence of interest in the molecule in the management of difficult to treat obstructive airway disorders. (Gupta 2006)
Figure-1. Structure of Ambroxol HCl.
The present review of literature stated that till date various methods have been reported for the determination of Ambroxol in biological samples and pharmaceutical formulations. Techniques such as Electrochemical, Spectrophotometry, High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Ultrathin layer chromatography, Gas chromatography, High-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) and Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), from which HPLC methods are used most extensively. Overview of the methods for determination of Ambroxol shown in (Figure. 2).
2. SAMPLE PREPARATION:
2.1. Solubility
With reference to Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), classification of Ambroxol comes under BCS class-I, it means Ambroxol has high solubility and high permeability (Yazdanian et al. 2005; Polli et al. 2004). To control the release of drug, various strategies like hydrophilic matrix system (Shaikh et al. 2011) and Microsphere (Kumar 2014) have been proposed . The solubility of the drug was tested in solvents routinely used for analytical methodology.
Sample preparation is an important part of analytical methodology, and about approximately 30% error generated in sample analysis was reported due to sample preparation (Hendriks et al. 1996).(Figure. 3) shows various diluents used for the analysis of Ambroxol. In major cases methanol was used as a diluent. The sample preparation techniques for the extraction of Ambroxol from biological matrices (plasma, serum and urine) (Hu et al. 2008) include protein precipitation, Liquid-Liquid Extraction had been chosen among various techniques. The solvents like acetonitrile, ethanol and n-Hexane etc. were tried alone as well as in combination (Tompe et al. 2013).
3. ANALYTICAL METHODS
3.1. Electrochemical methods
Yuanzhe et al. constructed a new electrochemical method for determination of Ambroxol HCl, the method was based on MWCNT/ Nafion modified glassy carbon electrodes. In cyclic voltammetry, the compound showed an irreversible oxidation peak. It was compared with the results on bare glassy carbon electrode and Nafion modified glassy carbon electrode, and obtained significant improvements in the sensitivity on MWCNT/Nafion modified glassy carbon electrode. The differential pulse voltametric detection limits were determined to be 3×10-8 M, 4×10-9 M and 1×10-9 M on bare glassy carbon electrode, Nafion modified glassy carbon electrode and MWCNT/Nafion modified glassy carbon electrode, respectively. At the optimized condition, a sensitive linear differential pulse voltametric response range for the Ambroxol was between 1×10-8 and 1.8×10-6 M on MWCNT/Nafion modified glassy carbon electrode.
(Piao 2012)
Habib et al. constructed an electrochemical procedure for the determination of Ambroxol in mucolytic. The method was based on adsorptive accumulation of the species at the hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE), The behaviour of adsorptive stripping response was studied by using various experimental conditions, such as type of supporting electrolyte, pH, accumulation time, pulse amplitude, scan rate and mode of sweep. In Britton-Robinson buffer solution, an irreversible reduction process involving transfer of one electron and one proton was took place. The response was linear over the 0.2-6 µ/ml concentration range. The average of determinations obtained by the square wave adsorptive voltametric method with its relative standard deviation was 99.8 +/- 2.40%. (Habib et al. 2005)
Figure-2. Overview of analytical methods for estimation of Ambroxol HCl in biological and pharmaceutical samples.
Figure-3. Various diluents used for the analysis of Ambroxol HCl.
3.2. Spectrophotometry
In the literature about 17 methods were reported for the estimation of Ambroxol using Spectrophotometry (Akhtar et al. 2013; Ponnilavarasan et al. 2011; Prasanthi et al. 2010 ) of which 1method are for determining Ambroxol alone, while the others are for quantifying Ambroxol in combination with other drug substances. Table 1. shows the summary of the reported spectrophotometric methods indicating the basic principle, λ max, solvent and limit of detection (LOD).
3.3. Capillary Electrophoresis (CE)
CE methods have excellent performance for separation of pharmaceuticals, which makes it the first-choice technique for separation of stereoisomer’s. For Ambroxol HCl analysis few authors have used CE as a separation and determination technique.
Tomas et al. constructed a sensitive capillary electrophoretic method combined with laser-induced fluorescence detection for the determination of Ambroxol HCl. Samples were derivatized with 5·10−4Mfluorescein isothiocyanate. A linear relationship between concentration and peak area was in the concentration range 0.008–42 μg ml−1 with a correlation coefficient of 0.9999. The method was demonstrated their applicability to serum and urine samples. (Tomas et al. 2000)
3.4. Chromatography
3.4.1. HPLC
3.4.1.1. Biological samples.
Various methods for the determination of Ambroxol in biological samples like plasma, serum and urine(Suresh et al. 2012; Dharuman et al. 2011 ) are listed in Table 2.
3.4.1.2. Pharmaceutical samples.
Analytical methods for the determination of Ambroxol HCl in pharmaceutical dosage forms using HPLC (Mallapur et al. 2011; Kotkar et al. 2012 )are shown in Table 3.
3.5. HPTLC
In the literature about 6 methods were reported for the determining Ambroxol HCl alone, and in combination with other drug substancesin pharmaceutical formulation and in biological samples by using high performance thin layer chromatography (Kasture et al. 2010; Bagada et 2013).The HPTLC methods are shown in Table 4.
Table 1. Representative spectrophotometric method for the analysis of Ambroxol Hydrochloride.
|
Compound |
Method |
λmax |
Solvent |
LOD(µg/ml) |
Ref. |
|
Doxofylline(DOX) and Ambroxol Hcl (AMB HCl) |
Simultaneous equation Q-Absorption ratio method |
274nm (DOX) 247nm(AMB) |
Methanol |
0.353(DOX) 0.157(AMB) |
( Akhtar et al. 2013) |
|
Ambroxol HCl and Loratadine(LOR) |
Simultaneous equation method
|
308nm(AMB) 245nm(LOR) |
Methanol |
2.31 (AMB) 0.482 (LOR)
|
(Ponnilavarasan et al. 2011 ) |
|
Ambroxol HCl and Guiaphensin(GUA) |
Simultaneous equation method |
242 (AMB) 272(GUA) |
Methanol |
-------- |
(Prasanthi et al. 2010 ) |
|
Salbutamol (SAL) and Ambroxol (AMB) |
Simultaneous equation (I)
Area Under Curve method
|
223 nm (SAL) 244 nm(AMB) Wavelength range 232‐217nm(SAL) 252-237nm(AMB) |
0.1N HCL |
-------- |
(Patel et al. 2011) |
|
Gatifloxacin(GFC) andAmbroxol HCl (AMB) |
Simultaneous equations |
286nm(GFC) 242 nm(AMB) |
Methanol |
0.65 (GFC) 1.37 (AMB) |
(Prabu et al. 2010) |
|
Ambroxol HCl, Guaifenesin(GUA) and Terbutaline sulphate(TER) |
Simultaneous equation, Second order derivative, Colorimetry |
244.5nm(AMB) 279.4nm (GUA) 307.5nm(TER)
|
0.1NNaOH, 0.1N Hcl Distilled water |
0.35 (AMB) 1.77 (GUA) 0.2(TER)
|
(Kimbahune et al. 2011 ) |
|
Levocetirizine2. HCl (LEVC) and Ambroxol HCl (AMB) |
Simultaneous equation, Absorbance ratio analysis Area under curvemethods
|
231 nm (LEVC) 245 nm (AMB) 228-234nm(LEVC) 242-248nm(AMB) |
0.1M HCl |
5.49(LEVC) 4.9(AMB)
|
(Patil et al. 2013) |
|
Levofloxacin (LVF) and Ambroxol (AMB) |
Simultaneous equation method (vierodt’smethod) |
288 nm (LVF) 244 nm(AMB) |
Distilledwater |
0.6(AMB) |
(Chanda et al. 2013) |
|
Salbutamol sulphate (SAL) and Ambroxol Hcl (AMB) |
Simultaneous equation method Area Under Curve method |
224.5 nm (SAL) 244.5 nm (AMB) 229.5-219.5nm(SAL) 249.5-239.5nm(AMB) |
Distilled water, 0.1N Hcl and phosphate buffer(pH 6.8) |
--------- |
(Chitlange et al. 2011) |
|
Ambroxol |
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy |
520 nm(AMB) |
Methanol |
145 μg/ml |
(Rufino et al. 2009) |
|
Guaifenesin(GUA) and Ambroxol HCl (AMB) |
Absorption ratio, First order derivative spectroscopy |
238 nm (GUA) 255 nm (AMB) 223nm (λ1) 273nm(λ2) |
Double distill water |
0.6 (GUA) 0.5 (AMB) 0.50 (GUA) 0.40(AMB) |
(Deshpande et al. 2012) |
|
Ambroxol (AMB) Guaiphenesin (GUA) and Levo Salbutamol sulphate (L-SAL) |
Four rapid derivative spectrophotometric methods |
252.2 nm(AMB) 282.6nm(GUA) 285nm(L-SAL) |
Double distill water |
--------- |
(Thakkar et al. 2012) |
|
Ambroxol HCl,(AMB) Guaiphensin (GUA) Cetirizine HCl (CTZ) and Phenylephirine HCl (PHE) |
Multivariate analysis |
246nm (AMB) 273 nm(GUA) 231 nm (CTZ) 274 nm(PHE) |
0.1NHCl: Methanol (1:9) |
1.01(AMB) 1.07 (GUA) 0.48 (CTZ) 2.11 (PHE) |
(Arora et al. 2013) |
|
Ambroxol HCl(AMB) Guaifenesin(GUA) and Loratadine(LOR) |
Simultaneous equations |
310 nm(AMB) 274 nm(GUA) 248 nm(LOR) |
Methanol |
------------ |
(Nalluri et al. 2013) |
|
Paracetamol(PAR) Ambroxol HCl (AMB) Levocetirizine.2 HCl (LCT)Phenylephrine HCl (PHEP) |
first-order derivative spectrosphotometry |
305.5 nm (PAR) 321 nm(AMB), 244 nm (LCTZ) 280 nm (PHEP) |
Distilled water |
0.0352 (PAR) 0.0373(AM) 0.0645(LCT) 0.0557 PHEP) |
(Kumar et al. 2014) |
|
Ambroxol HCl(AMB) Cetirizine Hcl(CTZ) |
Absorbance ratio methods |
243 nm (AMB) 229 nm (CTZ) |
Methanol |
0.0328(AMB) 0.0648 (CTZ) |
(Bhatia et al. 2008) |
|
Ambroxol HCl (AMB) and Guaifenesin (GUA) in presence of the oxidative degradate (AD) of AMB andguaicol (GD), the impurity of GUA |
MultivariateSpectro-photometric principal component regression (PCR) ,Partial least squares (PLS) |
246nm (AMB) 273 nm(GUA)
|
Methanol |
----------- |
(Abdelkawy et al. 2011) |
Table 2. Summary of HPLC methods to determine Ambroxol hydrochloride in biological sample.
|
Matrix |
Internal Standard |
Sample preparation |
Mobile phase |
Column |
Detection |
λ max (nm) |
Flow rate (ml/min) |
Rt and LOD |
Ref. |
|
Human Plasma |
Probenecid
|
liquid–liquid extraction |
MeCN: 30-40%, buffer conc. |
PhenomenexRC18 (150mm×4.6mm, 5μm) |
SPD 10A UV detector |
230 |
0.8-1.2 |
8.665 min |
(Suresh et al. 2012) |
|
Human plasma |
Nebivolol |
liquid–liquid extraction
|
Acetonitrile–phosphate buffer 20 mM) (20:80, %v/v) (pH 3.5) Acetonitrile:triethylamin (0.5%) in phosphate buffer 20 mM) (55:45, v/v) (pH 3.5) |
SupelcosilTM LCABZ (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) Kromasil C18 column (250 mm × 2.1 mm, 5 μm) |
PDA detector |
230 |
0.5 |
7. 5min
11.5min |
(Dharuman et al. 2011) |
|
Human plasma |
Furosemide |
protein precipitation with methanol |
0.15 M SDS, 8% npropanol, 0.3% TEA, in 0.02 M ortho-phosphoric acid (pH 4.0) |
Spherisorb-ODS 2 C 18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) |
SPD 10A UV detector |
220 |
1.0 |
3.4 min and 0.26μg/mL (LEV) 5.2 and 0.07 μg/mL (AMB)
|
(Belal et al. 2013 ) |
|
Rat plasma |
------ |
liquid–liquid extraction |
50mM pho-sphate buffer and methanol (3:7 v/v) |
Capcell Pac C18 MG-Shiseido (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) |
elector chemical detection |
850 mv |
0.2 |
----- |
(Rupali et al. 2012 ) |
|
Human Serum |
----- |
Protein precipitation |
Methanol: distilled water (containing 1% triethyl-amine (50:50 %v/v)(pH 3.5) |
protein-coated µ-Bondapak CN silica pre-column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) |
SPD 10A UV detector |
254 nm |
0.5 |
2.6min |
(Emara et al. 2012) |
|
Human Plasma |
------- |
liquid- liquid extraction |
Acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (0.1M) in the ratio of 20:80 (v/v) |
µbondapak C18column (300 x 3.9 mm, 10μ)). |
SPD 10A UV detector |
254 nm |
1.0 |
------ |
(Singh et al. 2014) |
.
Table 3. Reported analytical HPLC methods for determination of Ambroxol HCl either alone or in combination with other drugs in pharmaceutical dosage form.
|
Study aim |
Mobile phase |
Column |
Detection |
λmax (nm) |
Flow rate (ml/ min) |
Rt (in min) |
LOD/ LLOD µg/ml |
Ref. |
|
Simultaneous estimation of Cefixime(CEF) and Ambroxol HCl (AMB)in tablet |
Acetonitrile:methanol:0.5% ammonium acetate buffer(pH 5.54) (44: 16: 40 %v/v/v) |
Phenomenex-Gemini, RP-18 column (250 X 4.6 mm, 5µm) |
SPD-M 20A PDA
|
220 |
1.0 |
2.18 (CEF) 4.32 (AMB) |
3 (CEF) 0.8 (AMB) |
(Mallapur et al. 2011) |
|
Cefpodoxime -Proxetil(CFP) andAmbroxol HCl (AMB) in Bulk and in Tablets |
Acetonitrile: 0.025 M potassium di-hydrogen-phosphate buffer (70:30 v/v) (pH 4.0with ortho-phosphoric Acid). IS- Diclofenac sodium
|
Qualisil RP C-8 (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm) |
SPD-20A UV detector |
248 |
1.0 |
3.89 (CFP) 2.69 (PRO) IS- 5.52 |
0.18 (CFP) 0.09 (PRO) |
(Kotkar et al. 2012 ) |
|
Simultaneous Estimation of Cefixime(CEF)and Ambroxol HCl (AMB) in Tablets |
Acetonitrile: Phosphate Buffer(60:40 %v/v) PH-7.0 |
Luna Phenomenex RP-C18 (250x 4.6 mm, 5 μm) |
SPD-M 20A PDA detector |
230 |
1.0 |
2.75 (CEF) 5.01 (AMB) |
0.1(CEF) 0.15 (AMB) |
(Kamarapu et al. 2010) |
|
Simultaneous Estimation of (AMB) Ambroxol HCl And Cetirizine Hcl (CTZ)In Tablet Dosage Form |
Methanol–Pota-ssiumdihydrogen phosphate buffer 80:20 (%v/v) (10 mM, pH 3.5 ± 0.02, adjusted with ortho-phosphoric acid) |
Princeton C-8 (4.6 × 250mm, 5 µm) |
UV |
276 |
1.0 |
2.7 (AMB) 4.2 (CTZ) |
0.60 (AMB) 1.5(CTZ) |
(Maithani et al. 2010) |
|
Simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol(AMB) Chlorpheniramine maleate(CHL) and Phenylephrine Hcl (PHE)inbulk and liquid dosage form |
Methanol : Acetonitrile (50%:50%) and phosphate buffer 5 pH containing 0.75% TEA set by formicacid(40%:60%v/v) |
C-18 (250 × 4.6mm, 5μm) |
UV |
261 |
0.95 |
11.1 (AMB) 13.58 (CHL) 2.8 (PHE) |
11.58 (AMB) 0.66 (CHL) 7.04 (PHE) |
(Bagada et al. 2014 )
|
|
Estimation of Guaifenesin (GUA) and Ambroxol HCl (AMB) in Tablet |
Acetonitrile: 50mM potassium di-hydrogen phosphate buffer(22:78 v/v) (pH -3.2 using orthophosphoric acid) |
HiQSil C18 (250 X 4.6 mm, 5μm) |
UV |
262 |
1.0 |
7.5 (GUA) 9.5 (AMB) |
-------- |
(Deshpande et al. 2012)
|
|
Simultaneous Estimation of Ambroxol HCl(AMB) and Loratadine(LOR) in Tablet |
0.02M Potassium dihydrogenOrtho-phosphate: Acetonitrile (30:70 %v/v) ( pH-5 using Ortho phosphoric acid |
Symmetry C18 ( 4.6 x 250mm, 5µm ) |
UV |
245 |
1.0 |
2.25 (AMB) 7.58 (LOR) |
3.18 (AMB) 2.87 (LOR) |
(Sateesh et al. 2013) |
|
Simultaneous estimation of salbutamol sulphate (SAL) and ambroxol hydrochloride(AMB) in pharmaceutical dosage forms |
15mM Ammonium acetate:acetonitrile (16:84%v/v) in isocratic mode |
Phenomenex C18 RP (250 x 4.6mm; 5 μm) |
SPD-M20A PDA detector |
227 |
1.0 |
3.1(SAL) 4.5 (AMB) |
0.021 (SAL) 0.034 (AMB) |
(Nalluri et al. 2013)
|
|
Simultaneous Determination of Gatifloxacin(GAT) and Ambroxol Hydrochloride (AMB) in Tablet |
0.1 M phosphate buffer : Acetonitrile (55:45 % v/v) ( pH 5.5) |
Phenomenex RP-C18 (250×4.6 mm, 5μm). |
UV |
254 |
1.0 |
2.2 (GAT) 4.5 (AMB) |
----------- |
(Prabu et al. 2010)
|
|
Simultaneous analysis of Levocetirizine2Hcl(LCTZ), AmbroxolHcl(AMB), and montelukast sodium(MONT) |
15 mm of Ammo-nium acetate: Acetonitrile (40:60%,v/v)in isocratic mode |
Phenomenex RP-C18 (250×4.6 mm, 5μm). |
UV |
215 |
1.0 |
2.21 (LCTZ) 4.46 (AMB) 13.35 (MONT) |
-------------- |
(Srividya et al. 2013) |
|
Simultaneous Determination ofCefiximeTrihydrate (CEF) and Ambroxol HCl(AMB) in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form |
Acetonitrile:Methanol: Triethylamine (50:50:0.1, %v/v/v) pH 3.0 |
Phenomenex RP-C18 (250×4.6 mm, 5μm). |
UV |
254 |
1.0 |
1.6(CEF) 3.7 (AMB) |
0.615 (CEF) 1.86 (AMB) |
(Kasture et al. 2010) |
|
Simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol HCl(AMB) Dextromethorphan Hbr(DEX) and Guaifenesin(GUA) in pharmaceutical cough cold preparation |
Acetonitrile :Methanol :10mM Phosphate Buffer in 0.3% Triethyl Amine (25:15:60 %v/v) ( pH – 3 ) |
Hibar RP-C18 |
PDA |
205 |
1.0 |
5.87 (AMB) 5.87 (AMB) 7 (DEX) 12.33 (GUA) |
0.14 (AMB) 1.36 (GUA) 0.068 (DEX) 0.147 (AMB)
|
(Bagada et al. 2013) |
|
Determination of Bromhexine (BRO) Guaifenesin (GUA), Ambroxol (AMB) Salbutamol (SAL) /Terbutaline(TER) Pseudoephedrine(PSE) Triprolidine (TRP)and Chlorpheniramine Maleate (CPM) in Cough-cold syrups |
Acetonitrile:0.25 MM sodium hexane sulphonate:0.2 M ammonium acetate (35:4:10:51, % v/v/v/v) (pH 3.0-water) |
RP-Octadecylsilane (250 X4.6mm, 5µm ) |
UV |
254 |
1.0 |
3.0 (BROM) 3.5 (GUA) 4.3(SAL) 5.9(TER) 7.8(PSE) 9.4(TRP) 18.3 (CPM) |
0.0013 (BRO) 0.0013 (GUA) 0.008 (SAL) 0.0014 (TER) 0.003 (PSE) 0.0017 (TRP) 0.011 (CPM) |
(Njaria 2013)
|
|
Simultaneous analysis of Phenylephrine Hcl (PHE), Guaiphenesin (GUA), Ambroxol HCl (AMB) and Salbutamol(SAL) |
Methanol-Acetonitrile (1:1 %v/v) (pH 3.0 phosphate buffer) |
PhenomenexC8 column 250 × 4.6 mm, 5µm ) |
UV |
273 |
1.0 |
----------- |
0.22 (PHE), 0.50 (GUA), 0.70 (AMB) 0.55 (SAL)
|
(JOshi et al. 2011) |
|
Simultaneous Estimation of Salbutamol(SAL) Ambroxol(AMB) and Guaifenesin (GUA) in Tablet Dosage Forms |
Acetonitrile: pota-ssium di-hydrogen phosphate (70:30 % v/v)(pH- 4) |
SHISEIDO C18 column (250 x 4.6mm , 5μm) |
UV |
215 |
1.2 |
2.57 (SAL) 7.1 (AMB) 5.85 (GUA) |
4.28 (SAL) 1.23 (AMB) 3.56 (GUA) |
(Kamatham et al. 2013) |
|
Stability indicating method for the determination of Terbutalinesulphate (TER), Guaifenesin(GUA) Ambroxol Hcl (AMB) and preservatives(MP.PP) content in liquid formulations
|
Phosphate buffer : Acetonitril(0.01M Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer pH (6.0± 0.1) |
Sunfire C18 column, (250 x4.6mm, 5Μm). |
UV |
214 |
1.2 |
3.68 (TER) 15.17 (GUA) 18.71 (AMB) 23.27 (MP) 24.38 (PP) |
----------- |
(Bapatu et al. 2011) |
|
Ambroxol HCl (AMB) Potassium clavulanate (PC) and Amoxicillin trihydrate (AMX) in bulk drugs and laboratory prepared synthetic mixture
|
Methanol: 0.01 M phosphate buffer (14:86%V/V) (pH 3.0) |
Phenomenex Luna C18 (250 mm×4 mm i.d., 5μm) |
UV |
220 |
1.2
|
4.26 (AMB) 5.15 (PC) 6.25 (AMX) |
0.264 ( AMB) 0.504 ( PC) 0.269 (AMX) |
(Rajput et al. 2014)
|
|
Simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol (AMB) and Desloratadine (DES) in its pharmaceutical dosage form
|
Acetonitrile: Ammo nium acetate buffer ( 40: 60 %v/v)( pH -3.5,adjusted with 0.01M glacial acetic acid) |
Inertsil C18column (4.6× 250 mm, 5 µm) |
UV |
252 |
1.0 |
4.35 (AMB) 6.132 (DES) |
0.609 (AMB) 0.580 (DES) |
(MOses et al. 2013) |
|
Determination of Ambroxol HCl(AMB) in pharmaceutical preparations
|
Acetonitril–Water (60:40, %v/v) (pH 3.5adjusted orthophosphoric acid |
Princeton SPHERC (250 × 4.6 mm, 5µm) |
UV |
250 |
1.0 |
---------- |
0.001 |
(Muralidharan et al. 2013 ) |
|
Determination of Ambroxol (AMB) and Gemifloxacin(GMF) in tablet dosage forms.
|
Sodium Phosphate buffer: Acetonitrile, (40:60%V/V) |
HypersilC18 (4.6X250mm, 5 μm) |
UV |
246 |
1.2 |
3.4 (AMB) 2.3 (GMF) |
2.93 (AMB) 3.0 (GMF) |
(Begum et al. 2013)
|
|
Estimation of (AMB) Ambroxol HCl, CetirizineHcl (CTZ)in Combined Dosage Form
|
Methanol: Acetonitrile : water (40:40:20 %v/v/v) |
HIQ SIL-C column (2504X4.6 mm ,10 μm) |
UV |
229 |
1.0 |
10.495 (AMB) 4.155 (CTZ) |
0.033 (AMB) 0.065 (CTZ) |
(Bhatia et al. 2008)
|
|
Determination of ternary mixtures of Ambroxol HCl,Guaifenesin, and Theophylline |
0.05 M phosphate buffer:methanol:acetonitrile:triethyl-amine (63.5 : 27.5 :9 :0.25, v/v/v/v) pH 5.5 adjusted with orthophosphoric acid) |
RP-C18 analytical column (4.6X250mm, 5 μm) |
|
220 |
1.2 |
-------- |
----- |
(Abdelwahab 2012) |
|
Determination of a mixtureofAmbroxol HCl (AMB) and Guaifenesin (GUA) in presence of the oxidative degradate (AD) of AMB and guaicol (GD), the impurity of GUA |
Water: Methanol containing 1% tri-ethylamine(80:20,v/v) (pH 2.9) |
Waters Bondapack C18 column (4.6X250mm,5 μm) |
|
220 |
1.5 |
3.93 (AD) 8.44 (GD) 10.3±0.1(GUA) 16.3± 0.1 (AMB) |
----- |
(Abdelkawyet al. 2011) |
Table 4. Representative HPTLC methodsfortheanalysisof Ambroxol Hydrochloride.
|
Study aim |
Mobile Phase |
Detector |
λmax (nm) |
Retention factor (Rf) |
LLOQ in (µg/band)
|
Ref. |
|
Bioanalytical method for determination of (AMB) Ambroxol HCl and (CEF) Cefadroxil in human plasma
|
Toluene : Methanol (6:4% v/v)
|
UV |
254 |
0.69(AMB) 0.18(CEF) |
0.2(AMB) |
(Suresh et al 2012)
|
|
Simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol HCl(AMB) Dextromethorphan Hbr(DEX) and Guaifenesin(GUA) in cough cold preparation
|
Toluene: Methanol: Chloroform: Glacial Acetic Acid (6.5:1.5:1.5:0.5 %v/v/v/v). |
UV |
275 |
0.056(AMB) 0.056(DEX) 0.612(GUA)
|
0.171(AMB) 0.171(DEX) 1.853(GUA) |
(Bagada et al.2013 )
|
|
Simultaneous estimation of Amoxicillin trihydrate (AMX)and Ambroxol HCl (AMB) in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form
|
n-Butanol: 1.0 M Ammonium acetate: Methanol (7.5:2.0:1.5) (v/v/v) |
UV |
222
|
0.45 ± 0.02 (AMX) 0.68±0.02 (AMB) |
|
(Dhaneshwar et al. 2011)
|
|
Stability-Indicating HPTLC Determination of Ambroxol HCl(AMB) in Bulk Drug and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form
|
Methanol–Triethylamine (4:6 v/v). |
UV |
254 |
0.53 ± 0.02(AMB) |
0.01(AMB)
|
(Jain 2010)
|
Simultaneous determination of Roxythromycin (ROX) and Ambroxol Hydrochloride (AMB) in tablets
|
Benzene: Diethyl ether:Triethylamine( 4 :5: 1 v/v/v)
|
UV |
365 (ROX)255(AMB) |
0.95(ROX) 0.36(AMB)
|
0.48 (ROX) 0.45(AMB) |
(Mulla et al. 2012)
|
|
Determination of Ambroxol HCl and Guaifenesin by TLC- in Cough Cold Formulations |
Chloroform: Methanol: Ethyl acetate: acetic acid(70: 8: 2:10v/v/v/v) |
UV |
270 |
0.14(AMB)0.66(GUA)0.79(AD)0.88 (GD) |
--- |
(Abdelkawy et al. 2011)
|
3.6. Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) Method
Trivedi et al. (2011) constructed stability indicating reversed phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UPLC) method for simultaneous determination of Ambroxol hydrochloride (AMB), Cetirizine hydrochloride (CTZ), Methylparaben (MP) and Propylparaben (PP) in liquid pharmaceutical formulation. Chromatographic separation was carried outby using Agilent Eclipse plus C18, 1.8 μm (50 x 2.1 mm) column, at 237 nm detector wavelength. The optimized mobile phase containing mixture of 0.01 M phosphate buffer and 0.1 % triethylamine as a solvent-A and acetonitrile as a solvent-B. The developed method separates AMB, CTZ, MP and PP in presence of twelve known impurities/degradation products and one unknown degradation product within 3.5 min. At a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min at 50°C (column oven) temperature. Under the backpressure in the system was about 6,000 psi. The LLOQ (µg/ml) were found to be 0.12, 0.18, 0.13 and 0.16 of MP, CTZ, PP, and AMB respectively, and %RSD were found to be 3.5, 4.3, 5.7 and 4.8 of methyl paraben (MP), Cetirizine hydrochloride (CTZ), Propylparaben (PP),and Ambroxol hydrochloride (AMB) respectively.( Trivedi et al. 2011)
3.7. Gas Liquid Chromatography
Marucci et al. studied Ambroxol HCl in biological material by using gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. Pinazepam, was used as internal standard, at a concentration of 5 ng/ml in methanol. The % Recovery was found to be 100 ±2.3 % R .S.D. The limit of detection was 4 ng/ml of Ambroxol HCl for all the biological samples. (Colombo et al. 1990)
3.8. LC–MS
Xin et al. developed a novel, rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS method operated in segmental and multiple reactions monitoring for the simultaneous determination of amoxicillin and Ambroxol HCl in human plasma. Amoxicillin degrades in plasma at room temperature and readily undergoes hydrolysis by the plasma amidase. The degradation of amoxicillin in plasma was well prevented by immediate addition of 20 μL glacial acetic acid to 200 μL aliquot of freshly collected plasma samples before storage at −80°C. The lower limits of quantitation of Ambroxol and Amoxicillin were 0.5ng/mL and 5 ng/mL respectively. Furthermore, the mass response saturation problem with amoxicillin was avoided by diluting the deproteinized plasma samples with water before injection into the LC-MS/MS system. (Dong et al. 2013)
Kim et al. constructed a sensitive and selective liquid chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the quantification of Ambroxol HCl in human plasma. Domperidone was used as internal standard, with plasma samples extracted using diethyl ether under basic condition. A centrifuged upper layer was then evaporated and reconstituted with 200 µl methanol. The reconstituted samples were injected into a C-18 XTerra MS column (2.1 x 30 mm) with 3.5 µm particle size. The analytical column lasted for at least 600 injections. The mobile phase was composed of 20 mM ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile (pH 8.8), with flow rate at 250 µl/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode using turbo electron spray ionization. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizer, curtain, collision, and auxiliary gases. Using MS/MS with multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) mode, Ambroxol HCl was detected without severe interferences from plasma matrix. Ambroxol HCl produced a protonated precursor ion ((M+H)(+)) at m/z 379 and a corresponding product ion at m/z 264. And internal standard (domperidone) produced a protonated precursor ion ((M+H)at m/z 426 and a corresponding product ion at m/z 174. Detection of Ambroxol HCl in human plasma was accurate and precise, with quantification limit at0.2 ng/ml. (Kim et al. 2003)
Wen et al. developed LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of amoxicillin and Ambroxol in human plasma using Clenbuterol as internal standard (IS). The plasma samples were subjected to a simple protein precipitation with methanol. Separation was achieved on a Lichrospher C(18) column (150 mm x 4.6mm ID, dp 5 microm) using methanol (containing 0.2% of formic acid) and water (containing 0.2% of formic acid) as a mobile phase by gradient elution at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Detection was performed using electron spray ionization in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by monitoring the ion transitions from m/z 365.9-->348.9 (amoxicillin), m/z 378.9-->263.6 (Ambroxol HCl) and m/z 277.0-->203.0 (IS). Calibration curves were linear in the concentration range of 5-20,000 ng/mL for amoxicillin, and 1-200 ng/mL for Ambroxol HCl, with the intra- and inter-run precisions of <9% and the accuracies of 100+/-7%.(Wen et al. 2008)
Thummala.et al. studied the isolation, identification, and characterization of Ambroxol HCl’s unknown impurity. One unknown impurity of Ambroxol was formed in the formulated drug under stress conditions (40°C /75% relative humidity (RH) for 6 months) with the relative retention time (RRT) 0.68 in RP-HPLC. The impurity was enriched by exposing it to heat and it was isolated by using preparative HPLC. The enriched impurity was purified and characterized using the following sophisticated techniques: 2D NMR (gDQ-COSY, gHSQC, and gHMBC), FTIR, and LC-MS/MS. On the basis of the spectral data, the impurity was characterized as trans-4-(6,8-dibromoquinazolin-3(4H)-yl)cyclohexanol.( Thummala.et al. 2014). The comparative sensitive methods of various techniques are shown in Figure. 4.
Figure-4. Comparative sensitive methods of various techniques.
4. CHALLENGES:
Ambroxol HCl is used in preventing bronchial hyper-reactivity, as well as decreased airway hyper-reactivity by either increasing the lyso-phosphatidyl-choline turnover, or modifying epithelial secretion. As discussed earlier, Ambroxol HCl belongs to BCS class-I, it means Ambroxol has high solubility and high permeability. However, for successful treatment a constant and uniform supply of drug is needed. Hence, it represents significant formulation challenges. To overcome these problems and challenges an important strategy is considered, hydrophilic matrices are commonly used which achieves slow release of drug over an extended period of time. The onset of its pharmacologic action is often delayed and the duration of its therapeutic effect is sustained. Hence, in development of hydrophilic matrix, there is having chances to interference of excipients to drug. Furthermore, it becomes necessary to analysis of drugs, and selection of solvent is greater challenges for the analysis. The review of literature reveals that most widely used diluents are methanol and distilled water in HPLC methods, which prolonged the run times with greater tailing factor. It was observed that the drug gets slowly degraded in acidic conditions over a period of time. For spectrometric determination, the presence of multiple entities and excipients includes complexity with multi- component dosage forms, which could produce significant challenge to the analytical chemist during the development of assay procedure. Estimation of the individual drugs in these multicomponent dosage forms becomes difficult. For such instances like multicomponent dosage forms, chemo-metric methods can be preferred to routine spectrophotometric methods.
5. CONCLUSION:
The review is concluded that various methods such as spectroscopy, chromatography, electrophoresis and hyphenated technique are available for the quantification of single and multicomponent dosage form of Ambroxol HCl in biological fluids and pharmaceutical formulations. HPLC was extensively used for the determination of Ambroxol HCl in various matrices like plasma, serum and urine. For determination of Ambroxol HCl in biological samples, were commend the LC–MS/MS method, since this method combines the LC separation ability with MS sensitivity and selectivity, allowing the unambiguous identification of Ambroxol HCl and its metabolites. For analysis of Ambroxol HCl in pharmaceuticals, HPLC with UV detection is applicable because this method provides accurate results and low cost compared to more advanced detection techniques. This review revealed an overview of the recent state-of-art analytical methods for the determination of Ambroxol HCl.
6. DECLARATION OF INTEREST:
There is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the manuscript.
7. REFERENCES:
1. Abdelkawy, M., F. Metwaly , N. E. Raghy, M. Hegazy, and N. Fayek. 2011 Simultaneous determination of Ambroxol Hcl and Guaifenesin by HPLC, TLC –Spectrodensitometric and multivariate calibration methods in pure form and in Cough Cold Formulations. J Chromatograph Separat Techniq. 2: doi:10.4172/2157-7064.1000112.
2. Abdelwahab, N. S. 2012. Determination of Ambroxol hydrochloride, Guaifenesin, and Theophylline in ternary mixtures and in the presence of excipients in different pharmaceutical dosage forms. J AOAC Int.95:1629-38.
3. Akhtar, J., and M. Padaria.2013. Development & validation of UV spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of Doxofylline& Ambroxol Hydrochloride in bulk & their combined dosage form. Indo Global J of Phar. Sci.3: 90-95.
4. Arora, M., Ritika, and G. S.Sarma.2013. Development and validation of chemometrics assisted spectrophotomrtric multipurpose methods for simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride, Guaiphensin, Cetirizine Hydrochloride and Phenylephirine Hydrochloride for binary, tertairy or quaternary combinations. Inventi Rapid: Pharm Anal & Q Assurance. 1: Inventi:ppaqa/1144/13
5. Bagada, H., H. Panchal, P. Patel ,and A. Jani. 2014. Analytical method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol, Chlorpheniramine Maleate and Phenylephrine HCl in bulk and liquid dosage form by RP-HPLC method. World J of Pharmacy & Phar Sci. 3: 1458-1467.
6. Bagada, H., and K. Sagathiya. 2013. Development and validation of RP-HPLC and HPTLC method of analysis for simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol Hcl, Dextromethorphan Hbr and Guaifenesin in pharmaceutical cough cold preparation and statistical comparison of developed methods. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 6:312-316
7. Bapatu, H. Reddy, M. Ravi; M. U. Reddy, G. H. Reddy, C. M. Rao, and P. V. Reddy. 2011. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method for the determination of Terbutaline sulphate, Guaifenesin, Ambroxol hydrochloride and preservatives content in liquid formulations. J Phar. Res. 4 :4117
8. Begum, M. H., N. K. Agarwal, and S. Duraivel. 2013. Analytical method development and validation of Gemifloxacin and Ambroxol in solid dosage form by RP-HPLC. Ind. J Res. Phar & Bio. 1: 701-706.
9. Belal, F. F., M. K. Sharaf El-Din, N. M El-Enany, and S. Saad. 2013. Micellar liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of Levofloxacin and Ambroxol in combined tablets: Application to biological fluids. Chem. Central J. 7: 162. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-162.
10. Bhatia, N. M., S. K. Ganbavale, M. S. Bhatia, H. N. More, and S. U. Kokil. 2008. RP-HPLC and Spectrophotometric Estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cetirizine Hydrochloride in Combined Dosage Form. Indian J Pharm Sci. 70: 603–608. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.45398
11. British Pharmacopoeia. 2005. The Stationary Office Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Substances (A–I). Vol.1. London. 106–108
12. Chanda, S., D. Sireesha, V. L. N Prasad, and P. V. Diwan.2013. Development and validation of spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Levofloxacin Hemihydrate and Ambroxol hydrochloride in their combined dosage form. Int. J Phar. Res.& Bio –Sci. 2:311
13. Chitlange, S., S. Pandkar, M. Tawar, and S. Wankhede. 2011. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of Salbutamol Sulphate and Ambroxol Hydrochloride by using various solvent in bulk as well as in tablet formulation. Asian J Res Chem. 4: 746- 749
14. Colombo, L., and F. Marcucci. 1990. Determination of Ambroxol HCl in biological material by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. J Chrom. Biomed. Appl. 530: 141-147
15. Deshpande, S. D., A. V. Deosarkar, and S. G. Walode. 2012. Absorption Ratio, Derivative Spectroscopy and RP-HPLC methods for estimation of Guaifenesin and Ambroxol hydrochloride in tablet. Der Chemica Sinica. 3: 759-765.
16. Dhaneshwar, S.R. , M.V. Dhoka, S.S. Chopade, and V. K. Bhusari. 2011. Validated HPTLC method for simultaneous estimation of Amoxycillin trihydrate and Ambroxol hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian J Phar Biol Res.1: 129-135.
17. Dharuman, J., M. Vasudhevan, and T. Ajithlal. 2011. High performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of Cetirizine and Ambroxol in human plasma and urine—A boxcar approach. J Chromat. B , 879: 2624–2631.
18. Dong, X., L. Ding, X. Cao, L. Jiang, and S. Zhong. 2013. A sensitive LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of Amoxicillin and Ambroxol in human plasma with segmental monitoring. 27: 520–526. doi/10.1002/bmc.v27.4/issue)
19. Emara, S., M. Kamal, M. and Abdel Kawi. 2012. On-line sample cleanup and enrichment chromatographic technique for the determination of Ambroxol in human serum. J Chroma. Sci. 50: 91–96. doi:10.1093/chromsci/bmr033.
20. European Pharmacopoeia 5.0. 2005. Council of Europe. Vol.(2). France. 965– 966.
21. Gupta, P. R. 2006. Ambroxol-Resurgence of an old molecule as an anti-inflammatory agent in chronic obstructive airway diseases. Lung India, 27: 46-53.
22. Habib, H., and S. I. M. Zayed. 2005. Adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of Ambroxol. Pharmazie. 60: 193-6.
23. Hendriks, M.M.W.B., J. H. de Boer, and A.K. Smilde. 1996. Robustness of Analytical Chemical Methods and Pharmaceutical Technological Products. Elsevier. Netherlands.
24. Hu, W., Y. Xu, F. Liu, A. Liu, and Q. 2008. Rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of Ambroxol in human plasma. Biomed Chromatogr. 22:1108-14. doi: 10.1002/bmc.1032.
25. Indian Pharmacopoeia.2007. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Vol.1,The Indian Pharmacopoeial Commission, Ghaziabad. 701–702.
26. Jain, P.S. 2010. Stability-Indicating HPTLC determination of Ambroxol Hydrochloride in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form. J Chrom. Sci. 48: 45-48.
27. Joshi, S., C. Bhatia, C. S. Bal, and M. S. M. Rawat. 2011. Simultaneous analysis of Phenylephrine hydrochloride, Guaiphenesin, Ambroxol hydrochloride, and salbutamol (as salbutamol sulphate) by use of a validated HPLC method. Acta Chromatographica. 23:109-119.
28. Kamarapu, S.K., Vaijayanthi, ZEA. Bahlul, and R.K. Venisetty. 2010. A novel HPLC-PDA method development and validation for thesimultaneous estimation of Cefixime and Ambroxol HCl in tablets. Int. J. Phar Sci. & Nanotech. 3:893-896.
29. Kamatham, S.S., S. Kolli, D.D.Joga, K. R. Vasa, and B. D. Yanamadala. 2013. Simultaneous estimation of Salbutamol, Ambroxol and Guaifenesin in tablet dosage forms by using RP-HPLC. Int. J Phar Res & Bio. Anal. 2: 01-13
30. Kasture, V. S., M. M. Deshpande, and A. Seema. 2010. Application of HPLC and HPTLC for the simultaneous determination of Cefixime Trihydrate and Ambroxol Hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form. Eurasian J. Anal. Chem. 5: 227-238.
31. Kim, H., J. Y. Yoo, S. B. Han, H. J. Lee, and K. R. Lee. 2003. Determination of Ambroxol in human plasma using LC-MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 32: 209-16.
32. Kimbahune, R., K. Sunil, P. Kabra, K. Delvadiya, and S. Surani. 2011. Spectrophotometric simultaneous analysis of Ambroxol hydrochloride, Guaifenesin and Terbutaline sulphate in liquid dosage form (syrup). Int. J Pharma. Sci. Review and Res. 8: 24-28
33. Kumar, J. R. 2014. Formulation and Evaluation of Sustained Release Ambroxol Hydrochloride microsphere Enriched Syrup. J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. 6: 260-262.
34. Kumar, K. A., and P. Veerasundari.2014. Simultaneous estimation of Paracetamol, Ambroxol Hydrochloride, Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride, and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride in combined tablet formulation by first-order derivative Spectrophotometry. ISRN Spectroscopy.2014: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/248960
35. Maithani, M., R. Raturi, V. Gautam, D. Kumar, A. Gaurav, and R. Singh. 2010. Simultaneous estimation of ambroxol hydrochloride and cetirizine hydrochloride in tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC method. Int J of Comprehensive Pharmacy. 2: 1–3.
36. Mallapur, S., S. Panghal, G. Mubeen., D. Goli, and R. Shanbouge. 2011. A Novel HPLC-PDA method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of Cefixime and Ambroxol HCl in Tablets. Int. J. Phar. Sci. 3:1279-1287.
37. Mulla, S., A. Patil, S. Morge, and S. Kulkarni. 2012. Development and validation of HPTLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Roxithromycin and Ambroxol hydrochloride in combined dosage form. IOSR J of Pharmacy III. 2:04-07.
38. Moses, P. F., P. Singh, A. Raja, and D. Banji. 2013. Analytical method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol and Desloratadine in its pharmaceutical dosage form by RP-HPLC. World J Phar and Phar Sci. 2: 6246-6262.
39. Muralidharan, S., J. Raja Kumar, and S. A. Dhanara. 2013. Development and validation of an HPLC and a UV spectrophotometric method for determination of Ambroxol hydrochloride in pharmaceutical preparations. J Adv. Pharm Tech. Res. 4:65–68.
40. Nalluri, B. N., V. S. Kalyani, D. M. Bharathi, M. Anusha, and B. C. Priyanka. 2013. Development and validation of RP HPLC PDA method for the simultaneous estimation of Salbutamol sulphate and Ambroxol hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage forms. J Chemi.& Pharm. Res.5: 443-449.
41. Njaria, P. M. 2013. Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of Bromhexine, Guaifenesin, Ambroxol, Salbutamol/Terbutaline, Pseudoephedrine, Triprolidine and Chlorpheniramine Maleate in Cough-cold syrups. http://pharmchem.uonbi.ac.ke
42. Pai, P. N. S., G. K. Rao, N. Lalitha, and K. Pasha. 2005. Spectrophotometric determination of Ambroxol Hydrochloride. Ind. J Pharm. Sci., 67:741-742
43. Patel, P. A., M. N. Dole, P.S. Shedpure, and S.D. Sawant. 2011. Spectrophotometric simultaneous estimation of Salbutamol and Ambroxol in bulk and formulation. Asian J Pharm. Clin. Res.4: 42-45.
44. Patil, J. S., C. R. Rane, and R. D.Ingale.2013. Simultaneous spectrophotometric methods for estimation of Levocetirizine and Ambroxol in pharmaceutical dosage form. J Chem. Bio.& Phy. Sci. 3:115-1122.
45. Piao, Yuanzhe. 2012. Electrochemical behaviour of Ambroxol and its determination in pharmaceutical dosage forms on MWCNT/Nafion Modified Glassy Carbon Electrodes. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.7: 6084 – 6096.
46. Ponnilavarasan, I., S. N. Kumar and P. Asha.2011. Simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol hydrochloride and Loratadine in tablet dosage form by using UV spectrophotometric method. Int. J Phar.& Bio Scie.2: 338-344.
47. Polli,J. E., L. X. Yu, J. A. Cook, G. L. Amidon, R. T. Borchardt, B.A. Burnside, P.S. Burton, M. L. Chen, D. P. Conner, P. J. Faustino, A. A. Hawi, A. S. Hussain, H. N., Kwei G. Joshi, V. H. L. Lee, L. J. Lesko, R. A. Lipper, A.E. Loper, S. G. Nerurkar, J. W. Polli, D. R. Sanvordeker, R. Taneja, R. S. Uppoor, C. S. Vattikonda, I. Wilding, and G. Zhang. 2004. Summary workshop report: Biopharmaceutics classification system – implementation challenges and extension opportunities. J. Pharm. Sci. 93: 1375-1381. doi:10.1002/jps. 20064.
48. Prabu, S. L, S. Thiagarajan, M. Srinivasan, and Q. Marina.2010. Simultaneous estimation of Gatifloxacin and Ambroxol hydrochloride by UV Spectrophotometry. Int. J Pharm. Sci. Review and Research. 3: 123-126.
49. Prabu, S. L., M. Srinivasan, S. Thiagarajan and and Q. Marina. 2010. Simultaneous determination of Gatifloxacin and Ambroxol Hydrochloride in a tablet Formulation by Liquid Chromatography. Pharm. Anal. Acta.1: doi:10.4172/2153-2435.1000110.
50. Prasanthi, N. L., M. C. Krishna, S.S. Manikiran , and N. Rama Rao. 2010. Estimation of Ambroxol hydrochloride and Guiaphensin in tablet dosage form by simultaneous equation method. Int. J. Res. in Ayur. & Phar. 1:140-146.
51. Rajput, S., P. Bhamre, and S. Bambhrolia. 2014. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of Ambroxol hydrochloride, Potassium clavulanate and Amoxicillin trihydrate in bulk drugs and laboratory synthetic mixture. J Advanced Phar Edu & Res. 4:178-185.
52. Rufino, J. L., J. M. Santos, M. A. Rodrigues, H. R. Pezza,and L.Pezza. 2009. Determination of Ambroxol in syrups using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Quím. Nova.32: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422009000600029
53. Rupali, R., K. S.Dhot, K. B. Ilango, and S. Shabbeer. 2012. Pharmacokinetic Studies of Ambroxolhydrochloride Microspheres in rats after oral administration, Int. JRea. Pharm. Chem. 2: 280-288.
54. Sateesh, P. L., V. Pavithra, B. biswal, and G. Nagarjuna Reddy. 2013. Method development and validation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Loratadine by RP-HPLC in tablet dosage form. Int. J of Pharma Sci. 3:370-374.
55. Shaikh, A., P. Shaikh, Y. Pawar, S. Kumbhar, and R. K. Deshmukh. 2011.Effect of gums and excipients on drug release of Ambroxol HCl sustained release matrices. J. Current Pharm. Res., 6:11-15.
56. Singh, P., A. Bajaj, and P.A Psegaonkar. 2014. Design development and evaluation of matrix tablets of Ambroxol Hydrochloride: In Vitro – In Vivo Study. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 6:445-449.
57. Srividya, P., M. Tejaswini, D. Sravanthi, and B. N. Nalluri. 2013. Simultaneous analysis of Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride, Ambroxol Hydrochloride, and Montelukast Sodium by RP-HPLC - PDA Method. Journal of Liquid Chroma.& Related Tech. 36 : 2871-2881
58. Suresh, R., R. Manavalan, and K. Valliappan. 2012. HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of Levocetirizine, Ambroxol and Montelukast in human Plasma employing response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Drug Dev. & Res. 4:173-185.
59. Thakkar, A., Gagandeep, N. K. Gill, Karan, and G. S. Sarma. 2012. Simultaneous determination of Ambroxol, Guaiphenesin and Levosalbutamol sulphate in pharmaceutical formulations with the use of four rapid derivative spectrophotometric methods. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 57:1436-1441.
60. Thummala, V. R., M. I. Rao, and S. N. Rao. 2014. Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of One Degradation Product in Ambroxol by HPLC-Hyphenated Techniques. Sci Pharm. 82: 247–263.
61. Tomas, P. R., M. L. Carmen, A. Sanz, and E. Bravo. 2000. Sensitive method for the determination of Ambroxol in body fluids by capillary electrophoresis and fluorescence detection. J Chromat. B: Bio. Sci. & Appl. 742: 205–210.
62. Tompe. P. U., N. V. Shinde, M. C. Damle and A.R. Madgulkar. 2013. Development and validation of bioanalytical method for the determination of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Cefadroxil in human plasma. Int. J Res.Pharm. & Biomed. Sci. 4:1239-48.
63. Trivedi, R. K., M. C. Patel, and S. B. Jadhav. 2011. A rapid, stability indicating RP-UPLC method for simultaneous determination of Ambroxol Hydrochloride, Cetirizine Hydrochloride and Antimicrobial Preservatives in liquid pharmaceutical formulation. Sci Pharm.76: 525–543.
64. Wen, A., T. Hang, S. Chen, Z. Wang, L. Ding, Y. Tian, M. Zhang, and X. Xu. 2008. Simultaneous determination of Amoxicillin and Ambroxol in human plasma by LC-MS/MS: validation and application to pharmacokinetic study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 48: 829-34.doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.05.032.
65. Yazdanian, M., K. Briggs, C. Jankovsky, and A. Hawi. 2004. The “high solubility” definition of the current FDA Guidance on Biopharmaceutical Classification System may be too strict for acidic drugs. Pharm. Res. 21: 293–299 doi:10.1023/B: PHAM.0000016242.48642.71
Received on 20.07.2014 Modified on 10.08.2014
Accepted on 18.08.2014 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 7(10): Oct. 2014 Page 1208-1219